Leonar, Recruiterflow, Recruit CRM, Loxo: the honest answer on custom
Four AI-native platforms priced at $85 to $169 a seat. Where each of them beats a custom build, why the cost argument does not always favour custom on a small desk, and the one thing none of the four offers.
Read the post →The EU delayed the AI hiring rules to 2027. Here’s what still applies to your agency now.
The high-risk deadline moved to December 2027, and that is now law, published in the Official Journal on 24 July. The rule most likely to catch a boutique agency never sat on that clock: automated rejection of candidates is GDPR Article 22 in the EU, unmoved since 2018, with an EDPB enforcement action running in 2026. In the UK the same rule was rewritten on 5 February 2026.
Read the post →The certificate nobody was watching: how expiry dates quietly cost placements
Tickets, licences and work permits lapse on a date somebody already knows. The failure is never the date, it is that nothing was watching it. Why the spreadsheet loses, what warning at 180, 90 and 30 days actually buys you, and the design decision most trackers get wrong: what happens when the field is blank.
Read the post →Vincere or a custom CRM? The honest answer for recruitment firms
The £69 a seat is real and Vincere earns most of it. What moves the number is that the AI sits outside that £69 and bills separately. The five-year arithmetic, the export question worth asking before you sign, and where building your own starts to make sense.
Read the post →Zoho Recruit or a custom CRM? The honest answer for recruitment firms
On price, Zoho wins, and this article says so. The cost that never appears on an invoice, what Zoho users say about support when nobody is selling to them, and the question that decides it: who owns your customisation at the end?
Read the post →When you should NOT switch your recruitment ATS
Written by someone who sells the alternative: when staying on your current ATS is the right call, the five signals that dissatisfaction has crossed the line, and the sunk-cost question every owner gets wrong (hint: you already paid for custom once, in your own evenings).
Read the post →Your application form is quietly costing you candidates (and a database)
For every 100 people who click apply, around 8 finish. The other 92 are not all bad fits, a lot are good people who took one look at what you asked for and closed the tab. The fix is not a shorter form, it is collecting the heavy stuff later, with the volume sorted automatically in the CRM.
Read the post →Your data, your tenant: where do your candidate records actually live?
Every software choice quietly answers one question most buyers never ask: who actually holds your candidate data? The case for keeping it in your own Microsoft 365 tenant (fewer third parties, a cleaner GDPR story, no lock-in), and the honest caveats.
Read the post →Cross-border recruitment is an operations problem, not a sourcing one
When you move technicians across borders, the candidate is the easy 20%. The hard part is the 3–6 month journey from "yes" to "on site" (recognition, permits, documents that expire), and that's where sold placements quietly die. Why generic CRMs can't model it, and what a migration-fit system tracks.
Read the post →Bullhorn or custom CRM? The honest answer for boutique recruitment firms
The comparison nobody publishes because everyone is selling one side of it. When Bullhorn (or Vincere, or JobAdder) is the right answer, when custom on Microsoft 365 is, the actual 5-year cost math both ways, and the lock-in question every owner should ask before signing.
Read the post →EU Pay Transparency Directive: what recruitment firms must do before 7 June 2026
The directive transposes on 7 June 2026, and the rollout is a patchwork: some states have transposed, Ireland and the Netherlands will miss it. Here's what changes for boutique recruitment agencies in DE, AT, CH, HR and SI, and the five mistakes I'm seeing firms make. Practical 14-day compliance checklist included.
Read the post →5 signs your recruitment firm has outgrown spreadsheets
Most boutique agencies wait too long to migrate off spreadsheets and email. The cost doesn't show up as a line item. It shows up as placements you never knew you missed. Five honest, sourced signs your firm has crossed the threshold, plus when staying with spreadsheets is still the right answer.
Read the post →The €1.2M in your archive: what 20,000 unsearched CVs are actually worth
For a ten-desk firm with a ten-year archive, the conservative math comes out to €1.2 million in re-placeable candidate value sitting in folders nobody can search. The math shown, the caveats spelled out, and the cases where archive reactivation fails entirely.
Read the post →